Former DNA analyst charged with over 100 felonies

DENVER, CO – A former DNA analyst for the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Missy Woods, finds herself at the center of a legal storm as she faces 102 felony charges. Woods, who played a pivotal role in the analysis of DNA evidence in thousands of criminal cases across Colorado, retired in November 2023 amid an investigation into irregularities in her work. Now, she is held on a $50,000 bail as authorities unravel the implications of her alleged actions.

Once celebrated as a prosecutorial expert, Woods’ reputation took a dramatic turn following admissions that she had deleted crucial DNA data. She reportedly did this to bypass additional procedural steps, raising questions about the integrity of the forensic evidence in numerous cases. The revelation has sent shockwaves through the legal community, prompting a reevaluation of her extensive case history.

The charges against Woods are serious. She faces allegations of cybercrime, accused of causing damages exceeding a million dollars by altering or interrupting data on state computers. This charge alone carries the potential for a 48-year prison sentence. Additionally, Woods is charged with perjury, 48 counts of attempting to influence a public official, and 52 counts of forgery of public documents. While these charges are yet to be proven in court, a conviction could lead to decades behind bars.

Woods’ career, which began in the mid-1990s, spanned nearly 25 years. Her work as an expert witness in over 500 criminal cases earned her a formidable reputation. However, the recent allegations have cast a shadow over her achievements and raised concerns about the potential miscarriage of justice in cases she was involved in.

The repercussions of Woods’ alleged misconduct are far-reaching. More than 1,000 criminal cases could be impacted, with defense attorneys likely to challenge convictions based on her DNA analyses. This could lead to a wave of appeals and new trials, burdening the state’s judicial system for years to come.

The motivation behind Woods’ actions remains unclear. She reportedly told investigators that she was experiencing burnout, a sentiment that some find difficult to reconcile with the gravity of the charges. The case highlights the immense pressure and responsibility borne by forensic analysts, whose work can sway the outcomes of criminal trials.

As the investigation continues, the legal community braces for the potential fallout. The integrity of forensic evidence is paramount in the justice system, and any breach can undermine public trust. Woods’ case serves as a stark reminder of the need for rigorous oversight and accountability in forensic practices.

The outcome of this high-profile case could have significant implications for how forensic evidence is handled and reviewed in the future, ensuring that the pursuit of justice remains fair and impartial.